Main Article Content
Abstract
Transparent transactions, the protection of ownership rights, investor security, and sustainable growth all depend on effective land management. With an emphasis on ownership rights, deal procedures, and investor protection, this study contrasts the legal systems controlling real estate transactions in Nigeria and Uganda. Using a doctrinal research approach, this study looked at a number of significant legal sources, including the Land Use Act of 1978 in Nigeria, the Land Act of Uganda, pertinent constitutional provisions, and court decisions. Secondary sources include reports and academic articles. Important results show that Nigeria's centralised approach, which gives state governors control over property, has frequently resulted in power abuse and erected obstacles to profitable land investment. In contrast, Uganda's Constitution recognises a number of tenure arrangements that improve transaction security by protecting individual rights, spousal consent, and public access to property registration data. Additionally, it ensures that its residents possess property. According to the study's findings, Uganda's strategy offers investors and landowners clearer protections and is more in line with international best practices. In order to boost investor confidence and lower the risk of litigation, it advises Nigeria to think about amending its Land Use Act to add clauses requiring spousal permission, boundary confirmations by nearby landowners, and harsher penalties for fraudulent transactions. Nigeria's legal system would be enhanced by these changes, which would also make it more favourable to investment and sustainable land management.